A desperate need for rational thinking
by
Chuck Doswell
Posted: 08 February 2012
Updated: 14 February 2012:
some minor revisions and added a quotation:
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. - Thomas Paine
This
is my personal opinion. If you like, you can let me know what you
think about this. But if you're not willing to have your comments
posted on here, along with my response, don't bother me. For contact,
use cdoswell_#_earthlink.net -
use the email hyperlink or cut and paste, replacing "_#_" with "@".
Introduction
In today's world, torn by political and social strife, there are many
participants in that strife who believe sincerely that what the world
needs is more of that "good old-time religion". In this view, the
world’s troubles can be attributed directly to their chosen deity's
displeasure with our lack of faith and abject worship of said
deity. As they see it, it's those never-to-be-sufficiently-damned
disbelievers who are responsible for the mess we're in. They must
be evil to have doubts about the faith the believers have accepted
without any tangible evidence, and so are worthy only to be cast aside,
killed if they persist in their wickedness, and doomed to eternal
torment in hell.
I’m rapidly becoming an "aggressive" atheist. By this, I mean
that I no longer choose to hold my disbelief mostly within.
Instead, I'm openly proclaiming my atheism and trying to explain it in
terms that should be understood by anyone who chooses to engage in a
rational thought process. Contrary to the viewpoint I described
above, I believe a descent deeper into irrational religious beliefs
would endanger all of us, believers and nonbelievers alike. I'm
not trying to convert believers into unbelievers, but I'm saying that
if we give full vent to irrational beliefs, where the believers claim
to have all the answers in their supposedly sacred writings, then the
result could be an attempt to install a monolithic theocracy
world-wide. The only issue left to decide would be which set of
beliefs will prevail in this global jihad! None of the major
abrahamic religions is immune from this sort of radical evangelism,
although judaism seems rather more rational on the whole than
christianity or islam.
A thought experiment in gullibility
Let me illustrate the irrationality of the existing religious beliefs
with a thought experiment. Imagine that I (Chuck Doswell) start
to proclaim that I'm the human embodiment of an all-knowing,
all-powerful deity that is otherwise invisible to virtually
everyone. I used to make my power tangible through supernatural
acts experienced by thousands if not millions, but for reasons of my
own (reasons, by my own design, you're too stupid to understand), I
stopped doing these things in the late Bronze Age. That deity and I
really are one and the same, even though I talk to him from time to
time as if he were my father. Everyone in the world needs to be
beholden to me because I'm here to allow everyone to escape everlasting
agony in a really, really awful place I created especially for people
who choose not to believe in me! Oh yes, and I created those
people and I know in advance what their choice will be because I know
everything about everything!
It would be too easy for you to believe in my divinity if I did supernatural miracles for all to see! If you have any doubts
about my ability to
do these things, it turns out you can read about them in the works of
some ancient authors, who never actually met
any of my friends (those who actually saw me do those miraculous
things), wrote some
chronicles of my earlier self when I was performing supernatural acts
routinely in order to convince my friends at the time. These
authors wrote their accounts of my activities long after all my old
friends died, so it's a bit unclear just how they heard about such
events - the
tales of my earlier life must have been passed on to others by word of
mouth, which must be accurate, of course. After all, I
managed the whole process. You can believe pretty much everything
said in those chronicles - just ignore any historical inaccuracies,
outright logical nonsense, differing accounts of the same events by
different authors, contradictions, and so on.
If you don't believe I can do all these wonderful things written about
in those ancient accounts, or even
entertain any lingering doubts regarding the truth of my assertions,
I'm asking that you cast all those concerns aside. Just trust
me. Would I lead you astray? After all, I love you so much,
I'm giving you this chance to stay out of infinite torment and have a
great time worshipping me in a wonderful place I've created just for my
faithful
followers. Of course, I know what choice you're going to make
because I know everything, but don't ask me to tell you what your
fate's going to be. I prefer you not know - call your fear of
eternal torture a form of extra "motivation" to do what I demand.
I have the ultimate carrot - eternal life in heaven - and the ultimate
stick - eternal agony in hell. Just believe in me before all
others and do whatever I command.
Discussion
No rational person would ever accept my word for such claims.
They'd demand that I show
them by actual supernatural acts that I have
such powers. The whole story strains credibility to the extent
that only a fool would swallow such a load of nonsense from me, and
start to
worship at my feet - essentially just because I said so. The sad
fact is that charlatans like David Koresh and Joseph Smith have
fabricated such stories and actually had people swallow their
nonsense! No credible evidence exists for such a supernatural
deity apart from
the extremely dubious content of the "sacred" writings of the abrahamic
religions. If you accept it, that acceptance essentially has to
be on faith in those scriptural accounts, because of the aforementioned
absence of evidence you can
actually see and experience for yourself. Why would you be given the ability to think rationally if you're being asked not to use it to assess the claims for the existence of a supernatural deity?
If I were going to pinpoint any primary cause for the political and
social mess we're in, it's precisely because of extensive growth
of that very "good old-time religion"! We don't need people who
believe they have a stranglehold on truth and reality, to the exclusion
of any others. Such thought patterns are a liability to us now.
They're polarizing and divisive, without any rational constraint on
what some believers might be willing to do in order to assure the
dominance of their beliefs.
Atheism is not a religion - atheists are freethinkers who
basically only agree on one thing: they don't believe in a supernatural
deity. Apart from that one central principle, they're quite
diverse. Atheists have no churches, no rituals, no dogma, no
sacred scriptures, no creed, no tax-exempt status, no priests, no
seminaries, no governing body, no day set aside for them to
worship. Why would someone openly espouse a cause that leaves
them marginalized, hated, feared, and excluded, if they didn't have a
good reason? We get no benefits from being an atheist, beyond the
liberation of our ideas from the dogma of late Bronze Age understanding
of the world.
Many believers in the abrahamic faiths have a patronizing view of religions that preceded the
middle eastern abrahamic revolution in religion. At best, these ancient religions are
characterized by believers as the quaint mythology of ancient people. Can
modern believers not see the obviously mythic character of their
beliefs? Well, the obvious answer is a resounding "Nope!"
They can't
see that they're the inheritors of yet another purely human
mythological creation, quite comparable to all those other ancient
religions and, in fact, borrowing liberally from those other religions. All the abrahamic religions are nothing more than
a collection of myths that any rational person would have to put
aside as having no evident reality. Not only is there no evidence
to back up any of these extraordinary claims, but the sacred writings
are laced with historical errors, contradictions, and lack of logic
that, if seen at all objectively, would be denied any status other than
as a collection of purely fictional tales.
If we allow the irrationality of theism to creep into our lives, it can
serve as a catalyst for all sorts of abuse, foremost of which is the
command all these faiths have in common to push a particular set of religious beliefs on
everyone. Religion and democracy simply are not compatible
-
democracy requires rational thinking, compromise, and respect for other
humans without regard for their beliefs. Religion demands
acceptance on
faith and strict obedience to its dogma, without compromise with anyone
having differing beliefs (who are inevitably doomed
to death and eternal pain, so they simply don't matter). The religious right wing (especially
the christian and the muslim right wings which are really
crypto-fascist groups) wants to create a religious indoctrination
process in public schools, and to push their dogma deeply into every
facet of American life, public and private. They want to
establish what would amount to a fascist, exclusionary theocracy,
similar to what you might find today in places like Iran. This
would be the end of American democracy, even if the pro forma parts of
it (e.g., the three branches of government mandated by the American
Constituion) were to remain in place. Any religion outside of the
dominant one, including any atheistic freethinkers, would
systematically be excluded from participation in governance. A
religious test would be the first thing imposed - you’re with us, or
we’re against you! Clearly, freedom of religion would be the
first thing to go in such an event! The religion would be
monolithic - the winner of the jihad would be the only choice! Do
you really believe this would be a better world? Do you really
think that imposing your religious beliefs on everyone would make the
world a better place? If so, then it's obvious you probably wouldn't have
read this far into this essay, and would prefer that I shut up, or
even that I die.
I will die eventually of course. But I'll go down as proud to
be a freethinker, unshackled by late Bronze Age mythology. In a
world where we humans have the capacity to wipe ourselves out and
destroy the world, it seems to me that we have an urgent need for
rational thinking, not faith-based slavish adherence to dogma derived
from mythology! How can I remain passive and quiet about the
threat from religion to destroy democracy and reduce us to another Dark
Age dominated by superstition and fear?